Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.1%Queens University
76.9%Baylor
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBaylor -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.4
MODEL MONEYLINEBaylor -333
Baylor
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 74
Projected Total156.4
Projected ScoreBaylor 82
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index54.1
111.6Offensive Efficiency112.2
109.5Defensive Efficiency106.6
2.1Net Efficiency5.6
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.0
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5
70.2Tempo69.4
53.1%Effective FG%52.6%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.6%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %32.5%
36.2%Free Throw Rate35.5%
1.4Average Margin3.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Baylor HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBaylor holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–50.3), offensive efficiency (112.2–111.6), defensive efficiency (106.6–109.5), net efficiency (5.6–2.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.1–52.6), ball security (16.2–16.6), free throw rate (36.2–35.5).