Hofstra

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.2%Hofstra

50.8%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -103

Quinnipiac

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 75

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 76

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricQuinnipiac

57.3MMH Power Index51.8

112.2Offensive Efficiency109.4

103.8Defensive Efficiency105.1

8.4Net Efficiency4.3

-0.4Strength of Schedule-2.2

8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

67.6Tempo69.8

52.0%Effective FG%51.2%

16.5%Turnover Rate16.4%

31.8%Offensive Rebound %31.6%

34.8%Free Throw Rate35.4%

5.7Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–51.8), offensive efficiency (112.2–109.4), defensive efficiency (103.8–105.1), net efficiency (8.4–4.3).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHball security (16.4–16.5), free throw rate (35.4–34.8).