Seton Hall
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.8%Seton Hall
57.2%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRutgers -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.2
MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -134
Rutgers
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 73
Projected Total147.2
Projected ScoreRutgers 75
Team Comparison
50.8MMH Power Index48.2
106.9Offensive Efficiency108.6
106.4Defensive Efficiency107.8
0.5Net Efficiency0.8
4.4Strength of Schedule0.0
0.5Last 10 Net Efficiency0.8
67.8Tempo68.2
51.0%Effective FG%50.8%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.3%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
35.8%Free Throw Rate35.9%
0.3Average Margin0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rutgers HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRutgers holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (108.6–106.9), net efficiency (0.8–0.5), recent form (0.8–0.5), ball security (16.3–16.7).
Seton Hall COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.8–48.2), defensive efficiency (106.4–107.8), strength of schedule (4.4–0.0).