Clemson
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.6%Clemson
49.4%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -102
TCU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 75
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreTCU 74
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index54.4
111.9Offensive Efficiency110.7
103.9Defensive Efficiency104.8
8.0Net Efficiency5.9
5.5Strength of Schedule0.0
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency5.8
66.3Tempo69.6
52.2%Effective FG%51.6%
16.0%Turnover Rate16.3%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.5%
36.4%Free Throw Rate36.4%
5.3Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–54.4), offensive efficiency (111.9–110.7), defensive efficiency (103.9–104.8), net efficiency (8.0–5.9).
TCU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.5–29.8).