Stetson
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.4%Stetson
89.6%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -862
Cincinnati
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 68
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreCincinnati 82
Team Comparison
40.9MMH Power Index55.3
106.3Offensive Efficiency109.7
111.8Defensive Efficiency103.2
-5.5Net Efficiency6.5
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.0
-5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency6.5
68.9Tempo69.2
52.4%Effective FG%51.6%
17.1%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.1%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
35.2%Free Throw Rate34.5%
-3.8Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.3–40.9), offensive efficiency (109.7–106.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–111.8), net efficiency (6.5–-5.5).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.4–51.6), free throw rate (35.2–34.5).