UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
79.4%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -385
Dayton
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 70
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScoreDayton 79
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index58.6
110.3Offensive Efficiency111.9
105.9Defensive Efficiency102.9
4.4Net Efficiency9.0
0.0Strength of Schedule2.2
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency9.0
68.2Tempo68.7
52.9%Effective FG%52.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
34.2%Free Throw Rate38.7%
3.0Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (111.9–110.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.9), net efficiency (9.0–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–52.0), offensive rebounding (30.4–29.8).