Middle Tennessee
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.1%Middle Tennessee
56.9%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -132
UAB
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 75
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreUAB 77
Team Comparison
54.8MMH Power Index51.6
111.6Offensive Efficiency109.1
104.5Defensive Efficiency106.5
7.1Net Efficiency2.6
-0.5Strength of Schedule0.8
7.1Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
68.9Tempo70.4
52.0%Effective FG%51.2%
16.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
35.1%Free Throw Rate36.1%
4.9Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiddle Tennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–51.6), offensive efficiency (111.6–109.1), defensive efficiency (104.5–106.5), net efficiency (7.1–2.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.8–-0.5), ball security (15.6–16.7), offensive rebounding (31.3–30.9).