Stephen F. Austin
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.0%Stephen F. Austin
60.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -150
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStephen F. Austin 73
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76
Team Comparison
54.6MMH Power Index52.7
110.8Offensive Efficiency110.3
104.9Defensive Efficiency105.9
5.9Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
6.0Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
68.0Tempo68.2
52.0%Effective FG%52.9%
16.0%Turnover Rate17.0%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
34.4%Free Throw Rate34.2%
4.1Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStephen F. Austin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (110.8–110.3), defensive efficiency (104.9–105.9), net efficiency (5.9–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–52.0).