Quinnipiac
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.5%Quinnipiac
75.5%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -308
UCLA
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreUCLA 79
Team Comparison
51.8MMH Power Index55.9
109.4Offensive Efficiency112.5
105.1Defensive Efficiency105.5
4.3Net Efficiency7.0
-2.2Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0
69.8Tempo67.8
51.2%Effective FG%52.4%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
31.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.4%Free Throw Rate35.3%
3.0Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.9–51.8), offensive efficiency (112.5–109.4), net efficiency (7.0–4.3), strength of schedule (0.0–-2.2).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.1–105.5), offensive rebounding (31.6–30.8), free throw rate (35.4–35.3).