Army

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.8%Army

85.2%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRutgers -11.4

PROJECTED TOTAL150.1

MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -576

Rutgers

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 69

Projected Total150.1

Projected ScoreRutgers 81

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricRutgers

37.4MMH Power Index48.2

104.9Offensive Efficiency108.6

111.6Defensive Efficiency107.8

-6.7Net Efficiency0.8

-2.9Strength of Schedule0.0

-6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency0.8

69.0Tempo68.2

51.4%Effective FG%50.8%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.3%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

33.5%Free Throw Rate35.9%

-4.7Average Margin0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rutgers HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRutgers holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.2–37.4), offensive efficiency (108.6–104.9), defensive efficiency (107.8–111.6), net efficiency (0.8–-6.7).

Army COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.4–50.8), offensive rebounding (30.8–30.4).