Lamar
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.2%Lamar
74.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -297
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLamar 70
Projected Total147.6
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77
Team Comparison
47.4MMH Power Index52.7
107.3Offensive Efficiency110.3
107.2Defensive Efficiency105.9
0.1Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
0.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.8Tempo68.2
51.2%Effective FG%52.9%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.0%
32.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
34.0%Free Throw Rate34.2%
0.1Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.4), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.3), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.2), net efficiency (4.4–0.1).
Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.0–30.4).