Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.4%Colgate

88.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -13.3

PROJECTED TOTAL147.3

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -777

Clemson

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 67

Projected Total147.3

Projected ScoreClemson 80

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricClemson

47.8MMH Power Index59.9

109.5Offensive Efficiency111.9

107.9Defensive Efficiency103.9

1.6Net Efficiency8.0

-2.9Strength of Schedule5.5

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

68.7Tempo66.3

52.6%Effective FG%52.2%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.0%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %29.8%

34.3%Free Throw Rate36.4%

1.1Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–47.8), offensive efficiency (111.9–109.5), defensive efficiency (103.9–107.9), net efficiency (8.0–1.6).

Colgate COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–52.2).