Cal Poly
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.2%Cal Poly
67.8%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL158.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -211
UNLV
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCal Poly 77
Projected Total158.5
Projected ScoreUNLV 82
Team Comparison
52.5MMH Power Index53.6
110.8Offensive Efficiency110.6
106.0Defensive Efficiency106.8
4.8Net Efficiency3.8
-0.6Strength of Schedule1.8
4.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
72.8Tempo70.2
52.0%Effective FG%52.4%
17.5%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.8%Free Throw Rate37.2%
3.5Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.6–52.5), strength of schedule (1.8–-0.6), shooting efficiency (52.4–52.0), ball security (16.8–17.5).
Cal Poly COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.8–110.6), defensive efficiency (106.0–106.8), net efficiency (4.8–3.8).