UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
78.4%Arkansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArkansas -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.9
MODEL MONEYLINEArkansas -363
Arkansas
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73
Projected Total154.9
Projected ScoreArkansas 82
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index58.8
110.3Offensive Efficiency114.8
105.9Defensive Efficiency105.5
4.4Net Efficiency9.3
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency9.3
68.2Tempo71.4
52.9%Effective FG%53.1%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
34.2%Free Throw Rate36.0%
3.0Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Arkansas HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArkansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–52.7), offensive efficiency (114.8–110.3), defensive efficiency (105.5–105.9), net efficiency (9.3–4.4).