Bethune-Cookman
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.3%Bethune-Cookman
88.7%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL151.4
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -785
Cincinnati
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 69
Projected Total151.4
Projected ScoreCincinnati 82
Team Comparison
43.1MMH Power Index55.3
106.4Offensive Efficiency109.7
108.7Defensive Efficiency103.2
-2.3Net Efficiency6.5
-5.1Strength of Schedule0.0
-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency6.5
70.5Tempo69.2
52.0%Effective FG%51.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
37.3%Free Throw Rate34.5%
-1.6Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.3–43.1), offensive efficiency (109.7–106.4), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.7), net efficiency (6.5–-2.3).
Bethune-Cookman COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.0–51.6), free throw rate (37.3–34.5).