
Pepperdine
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.9%Pepperdine
68.1%Loyola Marymount
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLoyola Marymount -4.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.5
MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Marymount -213

Loyola Marymount
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePepperdine 73
Projected Total151.5
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 78
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index51.2
109.4Offensive Efficiency109.3
107.0Defensive Efficiency105.7
2.4Net Efficiency3.6
0.4Strength of Schedule0.4
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5
69.5Tempo69.2
51.2%Effective FG%52.2%
17.1%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %29.9%
35.3%Free Throw Rate34.9%
1.7Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Loyola Marymount HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.2–49.8), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.0), net efficiency (3.6–2.4), recent form (3.5–2.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.4–109.3), offensive rebounding (30.9–29.9), free throw rate (35.3–34.9).