
Tulane
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.6%Tulane
77.4%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -8.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -342

UAB
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 72
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Team Comparison
45.7MMH Power Index51.6
106.9Offensive Efficiency109.1
109.1Defensive Efficiency106.5
-2.2Net Efficiency2.6
0.8Strength of Schedule0.8
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
68.9Tempo70.4
51.4%Effective FG%51.2%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
38.0%Free Throw Rate36.1%
-1.5Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–45.7), offensive efficiency (109.1–106.9), defensive efficiency (106.5–109.1), net efficiency (2.6–-2.2).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.4–51.2), free throw rate (38.0–36.1).