Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.7%Colgate

48.3%Bucknell

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADColgate -0.4

PROJECTED TOTAL149.9

MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -107

Bucknell

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 76

Projected Total149.9

Projected ScoreBucknell 75

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricBucknell

47.8MMH Power Index40.5

109.5Offensive Efficiency105.5

107.9Defensive Efficiency109.8

1.6Net Efficiency-4.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

68.7Tempo68.4

52.6%Effective FG%51.1%

16.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %29.7%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.5%

1.1Average Margin-2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Colgate HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–40.5), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.5), defensive efficiency (107.9–109.8), net efficiency (1.6–-4.3).

Bucknell COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.5–34.3).