Bethune-Cookman
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.7%Bethune-Cookman
59.3%Florida A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -146
Florida A&M
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 75
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 77
Team Comparison
43.1MMH Power Index40.6
106.4Offensive Efficiency104.5
108.7Defensive Efficiency108.8
-2.3Net Efficiency-4.3
-5.1Strength of Schedule-5.1
-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
70.5Tempo69.8
52.0%Effective FG%51.3%
17.3%Turnover Rate17.9%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
37.3%Free Throw Rate36.3%
-1.6Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Florida A&M HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.1–40.6), offensive efficiency (106.4–104.5), defensive efficiency (108.7–108.8), net efficiency (-2.3–-4.3).