
Buffalo
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.1%Buffalo
70.9%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -5.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.6
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -244

Kent State
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBuffalo 75
Projected Total155.6
Projected ScoreKent State 81
Team Comparison
51.5MMH Power Index54
111.8Offensive Efficiency112.1
107.3Defensive Efficiency105.6
4.5Net Efficiency6.5
-0.9Strength of Schedule-0.9
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency6.5
68.5Tempo71.5
53.0%Effective FG%52.2%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.9%Free Throw Rate37.7%
3.1Average Margin4.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–51.5), offensive efficiency (112.1–111.8), defensive efficiency (105.6–107.3), net efficiency (6.5–4.5).
Buffalo COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.0–52.2), ball security (16.5–16.9).