UT Martin
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.0%UT Martin
69.0%Lindenwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLindenwood -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL149.8
MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -223
Lindenwood
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 72
Projected Total149.8
Projected ScoreLindenwood 77
Team Comparison
46.4MMH Power Index47.9
107.1Offensive Efficiency108.5
104.6Defensive Efficiency104.8
2.5Net Efficiency3.7
-4.0Strength of Schedule-4.0
2.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
68.1Tempo71.4
51.4%Effective FG%51.5%
17.9%Turnover Rate17.1%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %31.6%
36.2%Free Throw Rate36.3%
1.7Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–46.4), offensive efficiency (108.5–107.1), net efficiency (3.7–2.5), recent form (3.8–2.5).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.6–104.8), offensive rebounding (32.6–31.6).