Quinnipiac

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.4%Quinnipiac

64.6%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -3.9

PROJECTED TOTAL147.6

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -182

Merrimack

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72

Projected Total147.6

Projected ScoreMerrimack 76

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricMerrimack

51.8MMH Power Index51.9

109.4Offensive Efficiency109.6

105.1Defensive Efficiency105.1

4.3Net Efficiency4.5

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

69.8Tempo66.7

51.2%Effective FG%51.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.2%

31.6%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

35.4%Free Throw Rate36.7%

3.0Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–51.8), offensive efficiency (109.6–109.4), net efficiency (4.5–4.3), shooting efficiency (51.3–51.2).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.6–29.3).