UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.9%UT Rio Grande Valley
55.1%Incarnate Word
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIncarnate Word -1.3
PROJECTED TOTAL149.0
MODEL MONEYLINEIncarnate Word -123
Incarnate Word
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total149.0
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 75
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index47.6
110.3Offensive Efficiency109.2
105.9Defensive Efficiency108.9
4.4Net Efficiency0.3
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3
68.2Tempo67.7
52.9%Effective FG%52.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
34.2%Free Throw Rate35.3%
3.0Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Incarnate Word HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.6), offensive efficiency (110.3–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.9–108.9), net efficiency (4.4–0.3).
Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHball security (16.7–17.0), offensive rebounding (31.7–30.4), free throw rate (35.3–34.2).