UAB logo

UAB

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
46.5%UAB
53.5%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.0
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -115
Temple logo

Temple

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 75
Projected Total151.0
Projected ScoreTemple 76

Team Comparison

UABMetricTemple
51.6MMH Power Index46.4
109.1Offensive Efficiency107.8
106.5Defensive Efficiency109.4
2.6Net Efficiency-1.6
0.8Strength of Schedule0.8
2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
70.4Tempo67.5
51.2%Effective FG%51.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.9%
31.3%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
36.1%Free Throw Rate37.4%
1.8Average Margin-1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Temple HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–46.4), offensive efficiency (109.1–107.8), defensive efficiency (106.5–109.4), net efficiency (2.6–-1.6).
Temple COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.8–51.2), free throw rate (37.4–36.1).