
UCLA
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.1%UCLA
47.9%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL149.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -109

Rutgers
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 75
Projected Total149.1
Projected ScoreRutgers 74
Team Comparison
55.9MMH Power Index48.2
112.5Offensive Efficiency108.6
105.5Defensive Efficiency107.8
7.0Net Efficiency0.8
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency0.8
67.8Tempo68.2
52.4%Effective FG%50.8%
15.9%Turnover Rate16.3%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
35.3%Free Throw Rate35.9%
4.8Average Margin0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.9–48.2), offensive efficiency (112.5–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.8), net efficiency (7.0–0.8).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (35.9–35.3).