
Cincinnati
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.6%Cincinnati
68.4%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -5.0
PROJECTED TOTAL151.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -216

BYU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 73
Projected Total151.9
Projected ScoreBYU 78
Team Comparison
55.3MMH Power Index56.3
109.7Offensive Efficiency113.0
103.2Defensive Efficiency105.6
6.5Net Efficiency7.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
69.2Tempo69.8
51.6%Effective FG%52.7%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.3%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %31.5%
34.5%Free Throw Rate35.7%
4.5Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.3–55.3), offensive efficiency (113.0–109.7), net efficiency (7.4–6.5), recent form (7.4–6.5).
Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.2–105.6).