Bethune-Cookman

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%Bethune-Cookman

54.4%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -1.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.6

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -119

Grambling

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 75

Projected Total151.6

Projected ScoreGrambling 76

Team Comparison

Bethune-CookmanMetricGrambling

43.1MMH Power Index38.4

106.4Offensive Efficiency103.2

108.7Defensive Efficiency109.3

-2.3Net Efficiency-6.1

-5.1Strength of Schedule-5.1

-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.1

70.5Tempo69.5

52.0%Effective FG%51.3%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.7%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

37.3%Free Throw Rate37.4%

-1.6Average Margin-4.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.1–38.4), offensive efficiency (106.4–103.2), defensive efficiency (108.7–109.3), net efficiency (-2.3–-6.1).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.4–37.3).