Cincinnati

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

52.1%Cincinnati

47.9%Utah

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -0.5

PROJECTED TOTAL150.4

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -109

Utah

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCincinnati 76

Projected Total150.4

Projected ScoreUtah 75

Team Comparison

CincinnatiMetricUtah

55.3MMH Power Index47.3

109.7Offensive Efficiency109.3

103.2Defensive Efficiency109.2

6.5Net Efficiency0.1

0.0Strength of Schedule0.0

6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency0.1

69.2Tempo68.7

51.6%Effective FG%52.1%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.7%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.3%

34.5%Free Throw Rate34.9%

4.5Average Margin0.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.3–47.3), offensive efficiency (109.7–109.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–109.2), net efficiency (6.5–0.1).

Utah COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.1–51.6), ball security (16.7–16.8), free throw rate (34.9–34.5).