Army
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.9%Army
83.1%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -10.3
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -492
Colgate
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArmy 70
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreColgate 81
Team Comparison
37.4MMH Power Index47.8
104.9Offensive Efficiency109.5
111.6Defensive Efficiency107.9
-6.7Net Efficiency1.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
-6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6
69.0Tempo68.7
51.4%Effective FG%52.6%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.2%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
33.5%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-4.7Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–37.4), offensive efficiency (109.5–104.9), defensive efficiency (107.9–111.6), net efficiency (1.6–-6.7).
Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.8–29.8).