Loyola Marymount
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.6%Loyola Marymount
62.4%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPepperdine -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL151.5
MODEL MONEYLINEPepperdine -166
Pepperdine
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 74
Projected Total151.5
Projected ScorePepperdine 77
Team Comparison
51.2MMH Power Index49.8
109.3Offensive Efficiency109.4
105.7Defensive Efficiency107.0
3.6Net Efficiency2.4
0.4Strength of Schedule0.4
3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4
69.2Tempo69.5
52.2%Effective FG%51.2%
16.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
29.9%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
34.9%Free Throw Rate35.3%
2.5Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pepperdine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.2–49.8), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.0), net efficiency (3.6–2.4), recent form (3.5–2.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.4–109.3), offensive rebounding (30.9–29.9), free throw rate (35.3–34.9).