William & Mary
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.9%William & Mary
77.1%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -337
Hofstra
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 72
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreHofstra 80
Team Comparison
50.8MMH Power Index57.3
110.0Offensive Efficiency112.2
106.7Defensive Efficiency103.8
3.3Net Efficiency8.4
-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.5
71.5Tempo67.6
52.8%Effective FG%52.0%
16.6%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
38.2%Free Throw Rate34.8%
2.3Average Margin5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–50.8), offensive efficiency (112.2–110.0), defensive efficiency (103.8–106.7), net efficiency (8.4–3.3).
William & Mary COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.8–52.0), free throw rate (38.2–34.8).