Tennessee

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.3%Tennessee

50.7%LSU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLSU -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.9

MODEL MONEYLINELSU -103

LSU

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee 76

Projected Total152.9

Projected ScoreLSU 77

Team Comparison

TennesseeMetricLSU

58.4MMH Power Index52

112.9Offensive Efficiency111.4

103.8Defensive Efficiency107.6

9.1Net Efficiency3.8

0.0Strength of Schedule0.0

9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8

68.6Tempo69.8

51.9%Effective FG%52.3%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.4%

34.2%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

36.5%Free Throw Rate37.3%

6.2Average Margin2.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

LSU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–52.0), offensive efficiency (112.9–111.4), defensive efficiency (103.8–107.6), net efficiency (9.1–3.8).

LSU COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.3–51.9), ball security (16.4–16.8), free throw rate (37.3–36.5).