
Merrimack
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.3%Merrimack
61.7%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL146.4
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -161

Fairfield
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 72
Projected Total146.4
Projected ScoreFairfield 75
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index49.7
109.6Offensive Efficiency109.3
105.1Defensive Efficiency106.7
4.5Net Efficiency2.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
66.7Tempo68.4
51.3%Effective FG%51.3%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.3%
29.3%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
36.7%Free Throw Rate33.9%
3.0Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairfield HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–49.7), offensive efficiency (109.6–109.3), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.7), net efficiency (4.5–2.6).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.1–29.3).