Jacksonville

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.8%Jacksonville

71.2%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.6

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -247

Queens University

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreJacksonville 74

Projected Total153.6

Projected ScoreQueens University 80

Team Comparison

JacksonvilleMetricQueens University

47.3MMH Power Index50.3

108.5Offensive Efficiency111.6

108.8Defensive Efficiency109.5

-0.3Net Efficiency2.1

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1

67.8Tempo70.2

51.9%Effective FG%53.1%

16.7%Turnover Rate16.2%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

35.3%Free Throw Rate36.2%

-0.2Average Margin1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–47.3), offensive efficiency (111.6–108.5), net efficiency (2.1–-0.3), recent form (2.1–-0.4).

Jacksonville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.8–109.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–30.5).