
Fordham
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.4%Fordham
66.6%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuquesne -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -199

Duquesne
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 72
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreDuquesne 77
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index51.5
108.2Offensive Efficiency109.9
105.4Defensive Efficiency106.6
2.8Net Efficiency3.3
2.2Strength of Schedule2.2
2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
67.5Tempo69.9
51.5%Effective FG%52.3%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.9%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
33.6%Free Throw Rate36.4%
1.9Average Margin2.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duquesne HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.5–50.9), offensive efficiency (109.9–108.2), net efficiency (3.3–2.8), recent form (3.2–2.7).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.4–106.6), ball security (16.8–16.9), offensive rebounding (31.7–30.7).