Canisius

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.2%Canisius

88.8%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -13.4

PROJECTED TOTAL143.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -793

Merrimack

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCanisius 65

Projected Total143.4

Projected ScoreMerrimack 78

Team Comparison

CanisiusMetricMerrimack

36MMH Power Index51.9

102.7Offensive Efficiency109.6

111.1Defensive Efficiency105.1

-8.4Net Efficiency4.5

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-8.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

66.9Tempo66.7

50.7%Effective FG%51.3%

17.4%Turnover Rate16.2%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

34.9%Free Throw Rate36.7%

-5.6Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–36.0), offensive efficiency (109.6–102.7), defensive efficiency (105.1–111.1), net efficiency (4.5–-8.4).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.4–29.3).