
Harvard
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.4%Harvard
79.6%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL148.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -390

Pennsylvania
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total148.2
Projected ScorePennsylvania 79
Team Comparison
55MMH Power Index62.4
111.3Offensive Efficiency114.8
103.7Defensive Efficiency101.2
7.6Net Efficiency13.6
-0.6Strength of Schedule-0.6
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency13.6
66.9Tempo69.5
52.3%Effective FG%51.7%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.4%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
33.8%Free Throw Rate35.9%
5.1Average Margin9.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.4–55.0), offensive efficiency (114.8–111.3), defensive efficiency (101.2–103.7), net efficiency (13.6–7.6).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.3–51.7).