Clemson
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.6%Clemson
59.4%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.8
MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -146
Pittsburgh
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 71
Projected Total144.8
Projected ScorePittsburgh 74
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index57
111.9Offensive Efficiency111.3
103.9Defensive Efficiency105.7
8.0Net Efficiency5.6
5.5Strength of Schedule5.5
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency5.7
66.3Tempo67.0
52.2%Effective FG%51.8%
16.0%Turnover Rate16.8%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
36.4%Free Throw Rate34.6%
5.3Average Margin3.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pittsburgh HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–57.0), offensive efficiency (111.9–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.9–105.7), net efficiency (8.0–5.6).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.4–29.8).