UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.2%UT Rio Grande Valley
75.8%McNeese
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -313
McNeese
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 70
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreMcNeese 78
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index57.6
110.3Offensive Efficiency112.3
105.9Defensive Efficiency103.9
4.4Net Efficiency8.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency8.4
68.2Tempo67.5
52.9%Effective FG%52.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.0%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
34.2%Free Throw Rate36.3%
3.0Average Margin5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (112.3–110.3), defensive efficiency (103.9–105.9), net efficiency (8.4–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–52.0).