Niagara

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.5%Niagara

87.5%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -12.6

PROJECTED TOTAL143.3

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -700

Merrimack

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNiagara 65

Projected Total143.3

Projected ScoreMerrimack 78

Team Comparison

NiagaraMetricMerrimack

37.5MMH Power Index51.9

104.2Offensive Efficiency109.6

111.4Defensive Efficiency105.1

-7.2Net Efficiency4.5

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

66.2Tempo66.7

51.7%Effective FG%51.3%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.2%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

33.7%Free Throw Rate36.7%

-4.8Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–37.5), offensive efficiency (109.6–104.2), defensive efficiency (105.1–111.4), net efficiency (4.5–-7.2).

Niagara COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.3).