Boston University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%Boston University
66.3%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -197
Colgate
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston University 73
Projected Total150.0
Projected ScoreColgate 77
Team Comparison
47.4MMH Power Index47.8
110.3Offensive Efficiency109.5
109.0Defensive Efficiency107.9
1.3Net Efficiency1.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6
67.2Tempo68.7
53.6%Effective FG%52.6%
16.9%Turnover Rate16.2%
29.9%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
34.9%Free Throw Rate34.3%
0.9Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–47.4), defensive efficiency (107.9–109.0), net efficiency (1.6–1.3), recent form (1.6–1.3).
Boston University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–109.5), shooting efficiency (53.6–52.6), offensive rebounding (29.9–29.8).