Drexel

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.8%Drexel

87.2%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -12.4

PROJECTED TOTAL145.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -681

Hofstra

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDrexel 67

Projected Total145.9

Projected ScoreHofstra 79

Team Comparison

DrexelMetricHofstra

43.4MMH Power Index57.3

105.5Offensive Efficiency112.2

108.3Defensive Efficiency103.8

-2.8Net Efficiency8.4

-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4

-2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency8.5

67.4Tempo67.6

51.8%Effective FG%52.0%

17.3%Turnover Rate16.5%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.8%

34.9%Free Throw Rate34.8%

-1.9Average Margin5.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–43.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–105.5), defensive efficiency (103.8–108.3), net efficiency (8.4–-2.8).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.9–34.8).