
Auburn
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.8%Auburn
69.2%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -225

Vanderbilt
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAuburn 75
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81
Team Comparison
56.6MMH Power Index58.6
113.9Offensive Efficiency114.0
106.3Defensive Efficiency104.9
7.6Net Efficiency9.1
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
7.5Last 10 Net Efficiency9.2
69.4Tempo70.0
52.3%Effective FG%52.8%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.9%
32.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
37.8%Free Throw Rate36.7%
5.2Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–56.6), offensive efficiency (114.0–113.9), defensive efficiency (104.9–106.3), net efficiency (9.1–7.6).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.2–30.8), free throw rate (37.8–36.7).