UTEP

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.4%UTEP

84.6%Wyoming

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWyoming -11.0

PROJECTED TOTAL149.2

MODEL MONEYLINEWyoming -549

Wyoming

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTEP 69

Projected Total149.2

Projected ScoreWyoming 80

Team Comparison

UTEPMetricWyoming

43.7MMH Power Index55

105.3Offensive Efficiency111.3

109.4Defensive Efficiency106.3

-4.1Net Efficiency5.0

1.8Strength of Schedule1.8

-4.2Last 10 Net Efficiency5.0

68.3Tempo68.4

51.3%Effective FG%52.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.6%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

35.7%Free Throw Rate36.0%

-2.9Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wyoming HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.0–43.7), offensive efficiency (111.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (106.3–109.4), net efficiency (5.0–-4.1).