UTSA

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.1%UTSA

83.9%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -10.7

PROJECTED TOTAL151.4

MODEL MONEYLINERice -521

Rice

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 70

Projected Total151.4

Projected ScoreRice 81

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricRice

34.7MMH Power Index45.6

102.3Offensive Efficiency107.2

113.4Defensive Efficiency109.5

-11.1Net Efficiency-2.3

0.8Strength of Schedule0.8

-11.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3

69.6Tempo68.7

50.5%Effective FG%51.4%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %32.0%

34.3%Free Throw Rate35.5%

-7.7Average Margin-1.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.6–34.7), offensive efficiency (107.2–102.3), defensive efficiency (109.5–113.4), net efficiency (-2.3–-11.1).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0).