Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.4%Queens University
43.6%Stetson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -1.7
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -129
Stetson
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 79
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreStetson 77
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index40.9
111.6Offensive Efficiency106.3
109.5Defensive Efficiency111.8
2.1Net Efficiency-5.5
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.5
70.2Tempo68.9
53.1%Effective FG%52.4%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.1%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.1%
36.2%Free Throw Rate35.2%
1.4Average Margin-3.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–40.9), offensive efficiency (111.6–106.3), defensive efficiency (109.5–111.8), net efficiency (2.1–-5.5).