
Northeastern
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.3%Northeastern
83.7%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -513

Hofstra
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNortheastern 70
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreHofstra 81
Team Comparison
46.4MMH Power Index57.3
108.8Offensive Efficiency112.2
109.2Defensive Efficiency103.8
-0.4Net Efficiency8.4
-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.5
69.5Tempo67.6
52.2%Effective FG%52.0%
16.6%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
34.3%Free Throw Rate34.8%
-0.2Average Margin5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–46.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–108.8), defensive efficiency (103.8–109.2), net efficiency (8.4–-0.4).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.2–52.0).