
Bucknell
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.9%Bucknell
79.1%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -8.6
PROJECTED TOTAL149.9
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -378

Colgate
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 71
Projected Total149.9
Projected ScoreColgate 79
Team Comparison
40.5MMH Power Index47.8
105.5Offensive Efficiency109.5
109.8Defensive Efficiency107.9
-4.3Net Efficiency1.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6
68.4Tempo68.7
51.1%Effective FG%52.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.2%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
34.5%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-2.9Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–40.5), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.5), defensive efficiency (107.9–109.8), net efficiency (1.6–-4.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.5–34.3).