Kent State
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.6%Kent State
44.4%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -1.5
PROJECTED TOTAL156.7
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -125
Bowling Green
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 79
Projected Total156.7
Projected ScoreBowling Green 78
Team Comparison
54MMH Power Index45
112.1Offensive Efficiency107.2
105.6Defensive Efficiency108.0
6.5Net Efficiency-0.8
-0.9Strength of Schedule-0.9
6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8
71.5Tempo70.6
52.2%Effective FG%52.3%
16.9%Turnover Rate16.5%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
37.7%Free Throw Rate36.5%
4.6Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–45.0), offensive efficiency (112.1–107.2), defensive efficiency (105.6–108.0), net efficiency (6.5–-0.8).
Bowling Green COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.3–52.2), ball security (16.5–16.9).