Bellarmine

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.2%Bellarmine

72.8%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -6.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -268

Lipscomb

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBellarmine 73

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Team Comparison

BellarmineMetricLipscomb

43.8MMH Power Index47.8

109.8Offensive Efficiency108.5

112.9Defensive Efficiency108.5

-3.1Net Efficiency0.0

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9

-3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0

68.0Tempo68.9

54.0%Effective FG%52.7%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.5%

28.8%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

35.7%Free Throw Rate33.5%

-2.2Average Margin0.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–43.8), defensive efficiency (108.5–112.9), net efficiency (0.0–-3.1), recent form (0.0–-3.2).

Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.8–108.5), shooting efficiency (54.0–52.7), ball security (16.3–16.5).